Skip to main content

Piscataqua Savings Bank vs First Seacoast Bank

Side-by-side bank health comparison using FDIC financial data

Piscataqua Savings Bank (A) and First Seacoast Bank (A) are close on the BankHealth rubric. Asset bases: $365M versus $602M.

With grades this close, the choice between banks turns more on product fit, branch convenience, rates, and digital experience than on rubric-driven safety differences.

Reviewed by BankHealthData Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

Piscataqua Savings Bank has a stronger Bank Health Score of 87/100 (A) compared to First Seacoast Bank at 87/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Piscataqua Savings Bank holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 14.6% and an NPL ratio of 0.52%.

MetricPiscataqua Savings BankFirst Seacoast Bank
Health Score
Composite score (0-100) based on capital, loan quality, liquidity, and profitability
87/100 (A)87/100 (A)
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Core equity capital as % of risk-weighted assets (8%+ is well-capitalized)
14.6%*14.5%
NPL Ratio
Nonperforming loans as % of total loans (lower is better)
0.5%0.0%*
Liquidity Ratio
Cash and liquid assets vs obligations
37.5%*25.1%
Return on Assets
Profitability metric (above 1% is strong)
-0.3%0.5%*
Total Assets$365M$602M
Total Deposits$300M$471M
LocationPortsmouth, New HampshireDover, New Hampshire

Piscataqua Savings Bank has a stronger Bank Health Score of 87/100 (A) compared to First Seacoast Bank at 87/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Piscataqua Savings Bank holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 14.6% and an NPL ratio of 0.52%.

Explore More