Bank of Bearden vs Fds Bank
Side-by-side bank health comparison using FDIC financial data
Bank of Bearden (A) and Fds Bank (A) are close on the BankHealth rubric. Asset bases: $69M versus $106M.
With grades this close, the choice between banks turns more on product fit, branch convenience, rates, and digital experience than on rubric-driven safety differences.
Verdict
Bank of Bearden has a stronger Bank Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Fds Bank at 100/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Bank of Bearden holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 19.50% and an NPL ratio of 0.00%.
| Metric | Bank of Bearden | Fds Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Health Score Composite score (0-100) based on capital, loan quality, liquidity, and profitability | 100/100 (A) | 100/100 (A) |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio Core equity capital as % of risk-weighted assets (8%+ is well-capitalized) | 19.5% | 221.7%* |
| NPL Ratio Nonperforming loans as % of total loans (lower is better) | 0.0% | 0.0%* |
| Liquidity Ratio Cash and liquid assets vs obligations | 44.6% | 86.3%* |
| Return on Assets Profitability metric (above 1% is strong) | 2.3% | 411.2%* |
| Total Assets | $69M | $106M |
| Total Deposits | $63M | $15M |
| Location | Bearden, Arkansas | Mason, Ohio |
Bank of Bearden has a stronger Bank Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Fds Bank at 100/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Bank of Bearden holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 19.50% and an NPL ratio of 0.00%.