Skip to main content

Municipal Trust&Savings Bank vs Chicago Trust Co NA

Side-by-side bank health comparison using FDIC financial data

Municipal Trust&Savings Bank (A) and Chicago Trust Co NA (A) are close on the BankHealth rubric. Asset bases: $357M versus $126M.

With grades this close, the choice between banks turns more on product fit, branch convenience, rates, and digital experience than on rubric-driven safety differences.

Reviewed by BankHealthData Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

Municipal Trust&Savings Bank has a stronger Bank Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Chicago Trust Co NA at 100/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Municipal Trust&Savings Bank holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 16.5% and an NPL ratio of 0.00%.

MetricMunicipal Trust&Savings BankChicago Trust Co NA
Health Score
Composite score (0-100) based on capital, loan quality, liquidity, and profitability
100/100 (A)100/100 (A)
Tier 1 Capital Ratio
Core equity capital as % of risk-weighted assets (8%+ is well-capitalized)
16.5%99.7%*
NPL Ratio
Nonperforming loans as % of total loans (lower is better)
0.0%0.0%
Liquidity Ratio
Cash and liquid assets vs obligations
33.4%92.3%*
Return on Assets
Profitability metric (above 1% is strong)
2.6%4.0%*
Total Assets$357M$126M
Total Deposits$281M$0
LocationBourbonnais, IllinoisLake Forest, Illinois

Municipal Trust&Savings Bank has a stronger Bank Health Score of 100/100 (A) compared to Chicago Trust Co NA at 100/100 (A), a difference of 0 points. Municipal Trust&Savings Bank holds a Tier 1 capital ratio of 16.5% and an NPL ratio of 0.00%.

Explore More